Research Article

Analysis of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Commercial Disputes

Author: Varun Chaturvedi, 2nd year law student at Chandigarh University. 


One main message is that conflicts are inevitable, that settling dispute is inevitable. Every advancement in any human endeavor has to be made. The whole law body as it exists One of its main purposes today is the arbitration of conflicts. Most forms of disagreements are Today prevailing. In industry, in families, between countries and governments, there are conflicts, In academic fields and in centers of worship. In industry, conflicts are a part of life. If Between buyers and sellers, vendors and distributors, administrators and workers, or Conflict are necessary for industry and government as the interests of multiple parties’ clash. There’s no way to avoid the emergence of conflict. In reality, entrepreneurs also profit from the Conflict, since resources, inspiration, efficiency, and imagination will result in it. The obstacle lies in Conflict management so that it does not hinder development or, worse, ruin the opportunity to attain Company priorities.
As long as man is with man, there will always be contradictions that establish nature. It is important to provide an appropriate conflict resolution process. For a long period of time, the legal structure of in the world, most industrialized or developed countries has paid attention to the courts as the Single framework for dispute resolution. The arbitration of disputes in criminal courts has its own benefits and that’s why it has been there for a long time and still remains a sure thing. Method for settling conflicts between warring parties. There are a variety of concerns, however, that the court’s system of settling disputes by means of litigation remains.
According to a Harvard Business Review post, Litigation analysis as a tool to resolve conflicts It has been seen that there are many concerns associated with it. Litigation fees, for example, are as costly and pricey as they come. U.S. businesses spend more than $20 billion a year to litigate. Lawyers, a disturbing fact that distracts our interest from others and is even more important Company risks in our lawsuits’ proceedings. Fees for attorneys and other related expenses get the most out of the Mindfulness and they are quick to quantify. But the indirect market expense of litigation, the price of litigation,
For e.g., diverting key workers from constructive tasks or the expense of losing a Perhaps equally significant is the lucrative friendship with a longtime business ally. In other countries, although litigation may be an effective method of resolving disputes, it is not necessarily the most effective way to resolve disputes.
Preferred option because it is costly, has no chance of restoring a friendship that is impaired, it is extremely specialized and not necessarily accompanied by the parties concerned. In the world of trade, anytime there’s a disagreement, the stakes are bigger. More often than not, there is a strong incentive for parties to settle disputes as easily as cheaply as possible. What is implied by this is for the typical surge of lawsuits, the parties are less likely to move. Accordingly, Alternatives that contributed to the advancement of Alternate Conflict Resolution were pursued (ADR).

Formulas as a conflict settlement tool. While the emphasis of this paper is going to be largely on business disputes, ADR is used as a conflict resolution tool in some matters. Family matters, labor issues, and, in exceptional cases, criminal matters, for example. The word ‘economic’ is used in its general sense for the intent of this article. Word of the Word Here,’ commercial’ is used to cover all sorts of transactions involving trade, capital, industry, Company associations, and companies. There are several modes of company operations: tax, Maritime, electricity, retail sales, foreign exchange, intellectual property, etc. This paper will focus in particular on certain types of commercial activities and will also consider certain types of business activities. Commercial operations in general, too.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) provides a practical solution to the challenges sometimes in the process of settling disputes, litigation arises. Alternative Settlement of Conflicts It covers the ways in which disputes are resolved by other means outside of litigation. In these forms, there is the widespread use of ADR: arbitration, mediation, negotiation, conciliation, Resolution of online conflicts, collective practice, and early impartial assessment.
ADR is the ability to give a sense of being right to each party. Naturally, people hate being They say they’re wrong. Some learned authors support this view, who maintain that While one side may be right and the other wrong in any dispute, there may also be some on each side, an element of right; or one party may be morally right and another may be legally right; or
Genuine differences in perception or concepts can make it possible for everyone to be right from different points of view. Punctuates. The concerns will be litigation, mediation, internet conflict resolution, consultation, and conciliation. The key emphasis of this paper is on ADR forms in the resolution of company disputes. Concerned. The prevalence of the use of ADR to settle trade disputes arose because companies and companies

In settling disputes, businessmen could no longer bear the prolonged approach of the court of law. Indeed, new contractual contracts now have clauses involving first attempts by the parties Instead of contacting the courts in the first place, to address any conflict through a form of ADR.
There is no question that ADR acts as a conflict settling tool. It’s almost like Arthur Marriott, “In the Role of ADR in Commercial Dispute Resolution, it said: “If ADR is to be of any importance if ADR is to be of any value, “It has to work.”

Statement of the Research Problem:
As progressive as a proposal, the principle of including ADR in the arbitration of commercial disputes is Goes. Gets. The mechanism is still changing, however. Certain shortcomings and strengths exist Related to the use of ADR in industrial disputes. Certain forms of ADR, for example, are not binding on the parties concerned, which could then lead to parties avoiding the litigation mechanism Settlement in situations where the end findings do not satisfy them.
In comparison, when viewed individually, the words’ ADR ‘and’ Contractual Disputes ‘are Substantially broad in nature. Not every commercial dispute can be settled by one form of ADR. It is therefore important to highlight what kind of trade dispute a form can be used for ADR in order to resolve conflicts successfully.
By understanding the benefits and disadvantages of ADR, there is a framework for conflict settlement in the Commercial problems and by analyzing the present implementation of ADR in separate commercial areas.

Types of ADR

There are four forms of ADR:
• Mediation
• Arbitration
• Negotiation
• Conciliation
Mediation is the most common method of ADR. Mediation is a conflict settlement process that relies on efficient expertise in persuasion and negotiation. The task of the mediator is to help the parties more efficiently communicate and negotiate, thus improving their ability to make a decision. It is not the job of the mediator to decide the problems in conflict and the mediator has no right to do so. Mediation is not a mechanism for imposing compromise, while compromise is a part of the procedure. The weaknesses of and party are respected and a party is only expected to make a difference in its approach to the issue if it becomes confident that doing so is fair. Mediation is not a mechanism for imposing compromise, while compromise is a part of the procedure. The weaknesses of and party are respected and a party is only expected to make a difference in its approach to the issue if it becomes confident that doing so is fair. Mediation is the fastest-growing form of ADR today. It is used and comes in numerous ways in virtually every possible method of dispute resolution. With great results, the procedure has also been efficiently modified for multiple-party dispute resolution. On average, mediation phase success rates range from 80 percent to 85 percent. The legislation is slowly being revised to incorporate guidelines for conflict resolution in an effort to build on the progress rates.

Many are the benefits of mediation. Some of the strengths for mediation include:
• Efficient process: Mediation typically boasts a success rate of 80 percent -85 percent.
• Better results: The parties build the settlement.
• Speed: Mediation focuses on efficiently settling the problem.
• Cost: Mediation isn’t pricey.

Act of mediation in divorce

In family issues, consultation plays a major role. Mediation has been used when it comes to settling divorce disputes to encourage the sides to hammer out an agreed settlement rather than have one of them imposed outside the court. In the Family Law Act 1996, the importance of mediation was supported, but it is important to rectify that there are certain future mediation concerns. Mediation of marital management is to be supported by the Legal Aid Board on a sponsored basis. The mediation will not be considered until and until it seems to be acceptable for the situation.
There is a Code of Practice where, during the mediation, one must ensure the chances of the agreement under consideration and let clients know about the availability of unbiased legal advice. In the current phase, mediation is to be provided at a primary level. This will be done by allowing the group filing the declaration to come and hold a consultation with a mediator and see whether or not the service should be taken advantage of. In order to remind the court if the consultation has been held and if mediation will be required, the court will be entitled to delay hearings until the conference with the mediator. If the adoption of mediation would be a success story remains to be seen. If the House of Commons discussion rumbled on the effect that ‘it is easier to have mediation than to have lawyers debating over expenses,’ it was observed in the House of Lords that success relies very much on the mediator’s characteristics and past experiences and qualifications.


Arbitration is a private conflict settlement mechanism by the appointment of an arbitrator, an impartial, neutral third party who hears and considers the features of the dispute and issues a definitive and binding award verdict. The procedure is similar to the process of litigation when it requires adjudication, but the parties chose their arbitrator and the way in which the arbitration will proceed. For instance, if the disagreement is reasonably clear and does not include any factual problems, the parties may agree to waive a formal hearing and offer only written representations and evidence to the arbitrator, called arbitration records only, in such circumstances, the parties may agree to have a full hearing. The parties are also establishing their own adjudicatory platform, customized to the individual interests of the parties and the essence of the conflict.
Arbitration’s strengths over court adjudication can include the following:
• The expertise of the Decision-Maker: An arbitrator with competent experience of the law, economy, or trade-in which the conflict has occurred can be selected by the parties.
• Low Cost: Arbitration, provided the procedure is kept straightforward, is not costly.
• Speed: Settlement can be arranged easily, just as long as litigation does not take long.

Arbitration in Bangladesh

In Bangladesh, the present arbitration legislation is largely covered by the Arbitration Act, 1940, and numerous regulations concerned with the compliance of international awards. As for arbitration, there are also stray clauses, scattered in special Actions. The Arbitration Act of 1940, namely I Arbitration in the course of a suit, (ii) Arbitration with the intervention of the judge, and (iii) Arbitration rather than in the course of a suit and without the intervention of the court, looks closely at three forms of arbitration. The last group attracts the highest number of instances, in fact.
An arbitration arrangement needs to be published in pen and paper under the Act of 1940, but it is not necessary to be registered. A reference to current or potential variations may be made in the agreement. The name of the arbitrator can, either with the permission of the parties or in any other form specified in the agreement, be included in the agreement or left to be named later. Quite commonly, the laws of prestigious business organizations provide that the machinery of arbitration produced or approved by the rules of the association must be embraced by an individual who becomes a member of the association. For the purposes of the Arbitration Act, 1940, this often amounts to an “arbitration agreement.”
If an arbitration agreement has been signed for the application of potential differences to arbitration, it is not mandatory, at the time that the disagreement eventually occurs, to seek the fresh permission of all the parties to appeal to arbitration.


The shortest method of settlement of an alternate disagreement. They will negotiate a compromise of their own when both sides have a disagreement. There is no middle-man third party initiating the resolution process or implementing a resolution.


This is somewhat similar to mediation, where the parties are supported by an impartial third party to settle a conflict. In the process, the conciliator takes a more involved part. Conciliation does not bind the parties legally.
ADR strengths:
• There are some benefits of alternate dispute resolution (ADR) procedures:
• Reduced conflict time- It takes less time for a definitive decision to be made.
• Reduced costs for conflict resolution- Less capital is needed, i.e., it’s inexpensive.
• Flexibility-The parties have more flexibility in the option of the laws to be applicable to the conflict.
• Generate successful outcomes- Settlement ratios of up to 85%.
• Improved satisfaction among disputants with the result or manner in which the conflict is settled.
• Increased conformity of accepted solutions.
• A single procedure- The parties can agree to settle a conflict concerning intellectual property in a single process.
• Party autonomy- ADR provides parties with the opportunity to exercise greater control over the way their dispute is resolved because of its private nature than would be the case in court litigation. The parties themselves may select the most suitable decision-makers for their dispute, as opposed to court litigation. In addition, the applicable law, place, and language of the proceedings may be chosen by them. As parties are free to devise the most effective procedures for their dispute, increased party autonomy can also result in a faster process. This can result in cost savings on materials.
• Neutrality- ADR is neutral to the parties’ law, language, and institutional culture, thus avoiding any advantage in the home court that may be enjoyed by one of the parties in court-based litigation.
• Privacy- ADR proceedings are private. The parties can thereby agree to keep the actions confidential. This enables them, without concern about its public impact, to concentrate on the merits of the dispute.
• The finality of Awards- Arbitral awards are not normally subject to appeal, unlike court decisions, which can usually be challenged through one or more rounds of litigation.
• Enforceability of awards- The 1958 United Nations Convention for the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, referred to as the New York Convention generally provides for the recognition without review of the merits of arbitral awards on a par with domestic court decisions. This promotes the compliance of awards across boundaries considerably.
• Relationship preserves- Lets persons collaborate instead of making a winner or a loser.
ADR weaknesses:
Some of the ADR weaknesses are:
• As a stalling technique, it can be employed.
• The parties are not obligated to continue to negotiate or to mediate.
• It does not establish legal precedents.
• The omission of interested actors weakens the final interpretation.
• Parties may have limited ability to negotiate. There is not much of a say to the Sides.
• Little or no inspection of power imbalances among parties.
• It does not secure the civil interests of the parties. By way of alternate conflict settlement, the interests of the parties will not be covered.
• Your situation could not be a good fit- Alternative conflict settlements only fix financial or legal dispute problems. There will be no injunctive decisions arising from alternate dispute settlement proceedings. They should not proceed to an order that allows one of the parties to do or cease to do a certain affirmative act.
• There are limitations to the method of discovery. You should also be mindful that without the protections given to plaintiffs in lawsuits, such as those laws regulating discovery, you normally precede. In the discovery process, courts usually allow a great deal of discretion, which you would not have in an alternative dispute settlement.
• No assured settlement exists. Alternative dispute resolution processes do not necessarily lead to a resolution, with the exception of arbitration.
• Decisions on arbitration are final. Except for a few cases, it is not possible to appeal the judgment of a neutral arbitrator. On the other hand, rulings by a judge may typically be appealed to a higher court.
• It was easy to view involvement as a failure. Although some of this issue is resolved by the possibility of keeping the proceeding private, some parties may prefer to go to court “just on principle.”
• The situation could not be a good fit-Alternative conflict settlement normally settle either financial or legal dispute disputes in general.
• There are limitations to the method of discovery- One should also be mindful that it usually continues without the safeguards given to litigation parties, such as certain discovery laws.


I was able to learn a new term called Alternative Dispute Resolution via this topic (ADR). I have sought to provide my subject with as much detail as possible. I learned what alternative conflict resolution means, how many kinds of ADR are there, what the benefits and pitfalls of ADR are. I have also given several explanations and attempted to link Bangladesh to the Alternate Conflict Resolution. The final resort should be prosecuted and only used if the ADR procedures fail. However, it is important that all the parties concerned in the argument or conflict pursue ADR with an open mind and a desire to agree if any hope of success is to be had. Mostly, consultation is used. When it comes to managing family matters, arbitration is very helpful.


What's your reaction?

In Love
Not Sure

You may also like

4.7 3 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments